Dutch vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Dutch
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Dutch
Chinese
6,444
SOCIAL INDEX
61.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
155th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Dutch Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,623,365 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Dutch communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Chinese.
Dutch vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,539 compared to $77,465, a difference of 30.1%), median household income ($82,971 compared to $98,496, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,650 compared to $116,156, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,410 compared to $56,872, a difference of 4.5%), median earnings ($45,370 compared to $48,836, a difference of 7.6%), and per capita income ($42,605 compared to $46,098, a difference of 8.2%).
Income Metric | Dutch | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Fair $42,605 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,192 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Fair $82,971 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,370 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,410 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,339 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,265 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,081 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,650 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,539 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.6% | Average 25.9% |
Dutch vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (22.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.3%), single male poverty (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 15.1%).
Poverty Metric | Dutch | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Poor 20.5% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.7% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Dutch vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 76.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Dutch | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Dutch vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.73%).
Labor Participation Metric | Dutch | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.3% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.4% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.5% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.8% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Dutch vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.4%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.18%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Dutch | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.6% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.5% | Excellent 30.2% |
Dutch vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Dutch | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.6% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Dutch vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.6%), associate's degree (45.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and bachelor's degree (35.7% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Dutch | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.6% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 45.0% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.7% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.8% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Dutch vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 47.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.81%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.7%).
Disability Metric | Dutch | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.9% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |