Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,755,243 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from South Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Immigrants from South Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $105,748, a difference of 13.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,705, a difference of 12.0%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $42,508, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $67,234, a difference of 2.9%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $51,465, a difference of 5.4%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 16.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.44%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.45%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 18.9%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.26%), currently married (47.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 54.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 46.8%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.4%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.9% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 2.2%).