Immigrants from China vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,119,279 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 9.0 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $47,041, a difference of 15.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $104,993, a difference of 14.1%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $59,351, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $66,306, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $54,369, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.53%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.8%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.050%), currently married (47.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 67.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.8%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 27.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.4%).