Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,122,126 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $108,751, a difference of 10.1%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $96,378, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $113,215, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $55,891, a difference of 3.6%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $52,044, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.18%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.32%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.0%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.40%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (64.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.38%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.7%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.5%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 6.6%).