Immigrants from China vs Navajo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Navajo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Navajo
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Navajo Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,765,062 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Navajo.
Immigrants from China vs Navajo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $29,031, a difference of 86.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $66,529, a difference of 80.0%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $59,159, a difference of 78.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $42,380, a difference of 36.7%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $33,046, a difference of 42.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Navajo |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $29,031 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $70,989 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $59,159 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $36,999 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $42,098 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $33,046 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $42,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $66,529 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $69,759 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $47,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Navajo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 140.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 139.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 132.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 46.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 50.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 52.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Navajo |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 23.1% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 18.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 22.3% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 23.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 30.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 23.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 31.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 30.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 30.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 25.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 31.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 29.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 40.2% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 19.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 21.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Navajo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 116.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 111.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 105.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Navajo |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 8.4% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 7.3% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 29.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Navajo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Navajo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 56.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 69.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 32.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 72.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Navajo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 108.7%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 74.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 72.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (64.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.65, a difference of 12.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Navajo |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 40.1% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.65 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 39.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 51.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Navajo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 60.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 36.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 22.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Navajo |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 90.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Navajo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 134.2%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 128.6%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 124.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.0% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.28%), 6th grade (96.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and 9th grade (94.3% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Navajo |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 92.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 90.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 87.1% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 85.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 81.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 56.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 50.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 32.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 23.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 9.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Navajo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 78.0%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 76.6%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.9%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Navajo |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 33.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 58.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 4.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |