Immigrants from China vs South American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 431,070,243 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.199. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 17.1 South Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $95,362, a difference of 25.6%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $54,492, a difference of 23.6%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $101,856, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $53,939, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $59,854, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South American communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 29.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.5%), poverty (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.9%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 44.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 0.82%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South American communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 73.4%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 43.4%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and 7th grade (95.3% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South American communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.96%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%).