Immigrants from China vs Yakama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,031,841 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Yakama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $33,009, a difference of 64.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $76,226, a difference of 57.1%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $45,002, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $54,321, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $56,234, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 124.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 80.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 25.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 28.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 137.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 90.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 79.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 126.7%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 66.2%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.45, a difference of 6.7%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households (64.7% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 129.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 114.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 10.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 70.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 140.6%), master's degree (21.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 123.8%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 118.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 64.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 55.8%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 3.8%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 10.7%).