Immigrants from China vs Belizean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,589,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Belizeans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Belizeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.0 Belizeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $84,534, a difference of 41.7%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $48,358, a difference of 39.3%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $39,097, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,094, a difference of 13.4%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $37,429, a difference of 25.5%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 55.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 50.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.45%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 50.1%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 49.3%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.090%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.39, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 5.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.85%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 51.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 121.5%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 88.6%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 37.5%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.2%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 6.7%).