Pennsylvania German vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,266,483 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.783. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.316% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 316.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,888 compared to $77,465, a difference of 46.5%), median household income ($75,814 compared to $98,496, a difference of 29.9%), and median family income ($91,763 compared to $116,188, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $56,872, a difference of 11.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $58,162, a difference of 14.4%), and median earnings ($42,615 compared to $48,836, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 51.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 50.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 18.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 72.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 58.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.1%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (50.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 0.0%), currently married (49.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and family households (66.1% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 50.1%), master's degree (10.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 35.6%), and bachelor's degree (28.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 71.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 40.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.1%).