Portuguese vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Portuguese
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Portuguese
Chinese
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Portuguese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,615,991 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 85.8 Chinese.
Portuguese vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $77,465, a difference of 26.1%), median household income ($88,976 compared to $98,496, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $116,156, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $56,872, a difference of 0.37%), median earnings ($48,032 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.7%), and median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $41,461, a difference of 3.2%).
Income Metric | Portuguese | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,362 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,286 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $88,976 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,032 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,663 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,177 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,436 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,429 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,309 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,440 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Average 25.9% |
Portuguese vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 31.0%), and family poverty (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 17.0%).
Poverty Metric | Portuguese | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Excellent 8.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.5% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.8% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Portuguese vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 76.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Portuguese | Chinese |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Portuguese vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.96%).
Labor Participation Metric | Portuguese | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.4% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.0% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.4% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.4% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Portuguese vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.4%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.5%), currently married (47.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Portuguese | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.3% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.8% | Excellent 30.2% |
Portuguese vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.33%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Portuguese | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.6% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Portuguese vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.1%), associate's degree (44.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.62%).
Education Level Metric | Portuguese | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 92.0% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 44.1% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.5% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Poor 13.9% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Portuguese vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 41.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.7%), male disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Disability Metric | Portuguese | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.5% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.6% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |