Barbadian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,812,821 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.078% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to a decrease of 78.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $77,465, a difference of 43.0%), wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 36.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $116,156, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.49%), median earnings ($45,846 compared to $48,836, a difference of 6.5%), and per capita income ($42,406 compared to $46,098, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 76.6%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 74.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 72.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.6%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 43.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 39.9%), and unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 53.1%), married-couple households (39.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 27.8%), and births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 217.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 126.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 89.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 24.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 56.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 89.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 76.3%), college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and college, 1 year or more (56.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.84%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 46.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.7%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.4%), female disability (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%).