Indonesian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,937,440 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Indonesian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indonesians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indonesians corresponds to a decrease of 6.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,176 compared to $77,465, a difference of 43.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,890 compared to $116,156, a difference of 36.8%), and median household income ($72,856 compared to $98,496, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 14.0%), median female earnings ($36,140 compared to $41,461, a difference of 14.7%), and median earnings ($41,701 compared to $48,836, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 75.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 75.2%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.0%), single male poverty (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and single mother poverty (32.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 45.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and married-couple households (42.0% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and family households (61.5% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 48.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 30.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 117.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and associate's degree (41.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 28.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.0%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.2%).