Immigrants from China vs Seminole Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,224,170 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Seminole within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Seminole. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Seminole.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $76,584, a difference of 56.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $80,077, a difference of 52.6%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $69,420, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $45,649, a difference of 26.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $52,373, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 67.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 63.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 39.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 53.6%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 46.1%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.35%), and family households (64.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 68.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 132.0%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 110.8%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 91.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.13%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 82.3%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 70.6%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.4%).