Jamaican vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Jamaican
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Jamaicans
Chinese
821
SOCIAL INDEX
5.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
337th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Jamaican Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,723,368 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Jamaican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jamaicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jamaicans corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Chinese.
Jamaican vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,560 compared to $77,465, a difference of 42.0%), wage/income gap (19.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 32.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,327 compared to $116,156, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,670 compared to $41,461, a difference of 7.2%), median earnings ($43,343 compared to $48,836, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,929 compared to $58,162, a difference of 14.2%).
Income Metric | Jamaican | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,231 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,581 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $76,583 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,343 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,632 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,670 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,929 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,933 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,327 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,560 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.6% | Average 25.9% |
Jamaican vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 70.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 68.1%), and receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 12.5%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.7%).
Poverty Metric | Jamaican | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.9% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Jamaican vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 60.0%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Jamaican | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Jamaican vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.75%).
Labor Participation Metric | Jamaican | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.9% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.7% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Jamaican vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.7%), births to unmarried women (38.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.31 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.82%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (64.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Jamaican | Chinese |
Family Households | Average 64.2% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.31 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.4% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.5% | Excellent 30.2% |
Jamaican vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 118.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 91.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 11.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 31.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 56.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Jamaican | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 45.8% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Jamaican vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 63.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Jamaican | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.4% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.7% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.2% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.3% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.5% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.9% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.6% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Jamaican vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 37.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Jamaican | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Poor 11.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |