Guyanese vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,104,891 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Guyanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.311. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guyanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.052% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guyanese corresponds to a decrease of 52.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 41.5%), householder income over 65 years ($56,351 compared to $77,465, a difference of 37.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,966 compared to $116,156, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,973 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,210 compared to $58,162, a difference of 5.3%), and median earnings ($45,470 compared to $48,836, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 77.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 77.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 73.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.6%), single male poverty (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 54.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.3%), and female unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 40.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 47.3%), married-couple households (41.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and currently married (41.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.40 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 256.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 153.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 108.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 29.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 69.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 108.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 106.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.9%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 61.0%), male disability (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.8%), ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.9%).