Immigrants from China vs Sioux Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Sioux
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Sioux
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Sioux Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,916,236 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Sioux.
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $33,921, a difference of 60.0%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $67,792, a difference of 55.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $77,089, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 9.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $46,417, a difference of 24.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $52,509, a difference of 31.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Sioux |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $33,921 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $82,386 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $67,792 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $39,448 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $45,566 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $35,063 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $46,417 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $77,089 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $81,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $52,509 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 24.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 105.0%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 102.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 98.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 26.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 41.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Sioux |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 15.9% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 18.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 28.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 23.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 26.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 25.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 25.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 25.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 22.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 31.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 23.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 38.8% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 15.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 90.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 86.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 84.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Sioux |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 8.4% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 19.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 11.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 33.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Sioux |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 61.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 41.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 78.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 80.2%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 67.6%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.23%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.52, a difference of 8.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Sioux |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Good 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 41.5% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.52 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 41.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 41.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 50.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 24.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Sioux |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 56.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 109.6%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 105.5%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 98.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Sioux |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 89.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 59.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 53.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 29.1% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 10.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 89.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 59.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 7.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Sioux |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 27.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 49.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 2.5% |