Immigrants from China vs Sioux Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

Sioux

Good
Fair
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sioux Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,916,236 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Sioux.
Immigrants from China Integration in Sioux Communities

Immigrants from China vs Sioux Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $33,921, a difference of 60.0%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $67,792, a difference of 55.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $77,089, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 9.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $46,417, a difference of 24.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $52,509, a difference of 31.7%).
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaSioux
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Tragic
$33,921
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Tragic
$82,386
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Tragic
$67,792
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Tragic
$39,448
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Tragic
$45,566
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Tragic
$35,063
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Tragic
$46,417
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Tragic
$77,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Tragic
$81,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Tragic
$52,509
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Exceptional
24.3%

Immigrants from China vs Sioux Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 105.0%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 102.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 98.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 26.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 41.6%).
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaSioux
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
18.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Tragic
28.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
26.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
25.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
25.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
25.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Tragic
31.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
23.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Tragic
38.8%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
8.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
16.8%

Immigrants from China vs Sioux Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 90.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 86.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 84.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.6%).
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaSioux
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.4%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
11.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.9%

Immigrants from China vs Sioux Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 33.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaSioux
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Tragic
61.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
41.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
78.0%

Immigrants from China vs Sioux Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 80.2%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 67.6%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.23%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.52, a difference of 8.9%).
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaSioux
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
41.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.52
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
41.0%

Immigrants from China vs Sioux Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 50.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 24.0%).
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaSioux
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
56.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from China vs Sioux Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 109.6%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 105.5%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 98.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaSioux
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
82.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Tragic
59.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
53.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
29.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from China vs Sioux Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 89.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 59.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 7.4%).
Immigrants from China vs Sioux Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaSioux
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Tragic
49.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
2.5%