Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

New Zealanders

Good
Excellent
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,591,536 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 3.3 New Zealanders.
Immigrants from China Integration in New Zealander Communities

Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $105,085, a difference of 14.0%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $95,146, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $42,446, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $67,333, a difference of 2.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $50,575, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 22.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.57%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.85%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaNew Zealander
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.9%

Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaNew Zealander
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.3%

Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.67%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Fair
82.6%

Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 23.0%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaNew Zealander
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Excellent
30.3%

Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 48.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 10.1%).
Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.4%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.9% compared to 70.2%, a difference of 0.89%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.98%).
Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Exceptional
2.5%

Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.29%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaNew Zealander
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%