Immigrants from China vs African Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
African
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Africans
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
624
SOCIAL INDEX
3.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
341st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
African Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 406,444,063 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Africans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.685. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 14.5 Africans.
Immigrants from China vs African Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $78,986, a difference of 51.6%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $72,650, a difference of 45.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $84,925, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 16.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $46,838, a difference of 23.7%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $36,530, a difference of 28.6%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | African |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $37,785 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $87,820 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $72,650 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $41,955 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $47,994 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $36,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $46,838 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $78,986 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $84,925 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $53,711 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Immigrants from China vs African Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 67.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 63.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 13.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | African |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 16.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 22.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 22.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 21.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 24.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 18.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 33.3% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 12.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants from China vs African Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 47.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | African |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 11.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants from China vs African Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | African |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 80.5% |
Immigrants from China vs African Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 61.6%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 60.9%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.79%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | African |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Poor 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 40.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 41.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 39.7% |
Immigrants from China vs African Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 23.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.20%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | African |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Tragic 87.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 51.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from China vs African Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 96.9%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 83.3%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.060%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and 5th grade (96.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | African |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Poor 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Poor 97.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Poor 97.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Poor 96.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Poor 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 94.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 89.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 87.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 83.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 61.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 55.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 41.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 32.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from China vs African Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 56.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 43.5%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | African |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 26.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 48.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Fair 3.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |