Northern European vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Northern European
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Northern Europeans
Chinese
8,451
SOCIAL INDEX
82.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
71st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Northern European Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,457,729 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Northern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.834. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Northern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.885% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Northern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 1,885.1 Chinese.
Northern European vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Northern European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,658 compared to $77,465, a difference of 19.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,678 compared to $58,162, a difference of 12.6%), and wage/income gap (28.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,887 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.10%), median female earnings ($40,491 compared to $41,461, a difference of 2.4%), and median male earnings ($58,588 compared to $56,872, a difference of 3.0%).
Income Metric | Northern European | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,698 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,635 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,446 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,887 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $58,588 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,491 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,678 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $100,457 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $107,870 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,658 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.3% | Average 25.9% |
Northern European vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Northern European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (20.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.68%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.9%).
Poverty Metric | Northern European | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Poor 20.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Poor 13.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Northern European vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Northern European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Northern European | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Northern European vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Northern European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.63%).
Labor Participation Metric | Northern European | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.8% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.7% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Northern European vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Northern European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.8%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (48.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Northern European | Chinese |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Poor 27.2% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Excellent 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Excellent 30.2% |
Northern European vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Northern European | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Northern European vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Northern European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.5%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 8th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Northern European | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.0% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.7% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Fair 1.8% |
Northern European vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.27%), disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Disability Metric | Northern European | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.6% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |