Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Chinese
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,148,966 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.302% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 302.4 Chinese.
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $77,465, a difference of 40.0%), wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 34.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $116,156, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($45,820 compared to $48,836, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $58,162, a difference of 10.5%).
Income Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,655 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $94,466 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,402 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,820 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,446 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,958 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,631 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,856 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,357 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,327 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.3% | Average 25.9% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 75.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 70.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 10.7%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.5%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 20.3%).
Poverty Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 41.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 24.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.66%).
Labor Participation Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.9% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.5% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.4%), married-couple households (40.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 23.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.55%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (63.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.6% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.5% | Excellent 30.2% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 188.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 108.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 75.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 20.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 47.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 75.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 23.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 76.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 40.9% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.3% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 76.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.4% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.9% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.1% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.6% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.7% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 47.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 23.9% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |