Immigrants from China vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,531,406 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.415. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $93,631, a difference of 27.9%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $53,680, a difference of 25.5%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $100,656, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $52,465, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $59,090, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 25.3%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.2%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.79%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 34.2%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.9%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.16%), family households (64.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 34.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 74.5%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 45.3%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.0% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (95.3% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.15%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%).