Immigrants from China vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,433,793 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.256. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $81,531, a difference of 46.9%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $37,695, a difference of 44.0%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $73,509, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $48,603, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $54,029, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 60.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 52.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 39.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 53.6%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 47.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.50%), and family households (64.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 58.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 105.2%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 93.7%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.27%), 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 70.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.7%).