Immigrants from China vs Croatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 343,029,301 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.468. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Croatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Croatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $102,414, a difference of 16.9%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $90,685, a difference of 16.2%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $40,993, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $63,225, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,662, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 26.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.30%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 32.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 22.3%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.6%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.19%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 83.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.5%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.5%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.4%).