Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,433,016 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $42,694, a difference of 27.1%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $54,958, a difference of 22.6%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $57,074, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $64,795, a difference of 6.8%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $93,933, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 26.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 18.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 47.2%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.5%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.35%), currently married (47.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (64.7% compared to 68.8%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 93.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 59.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 21.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 43.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 97.8%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 80.0%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 29.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 23.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 9.2%).