Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Croatia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,175,276 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Croatia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Immigrants from Croatia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $104,503, a difference of 14.6%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $92,225, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $108,304, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $54,343, a difference of 6.6%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $50,417, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and single female poverty (18.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 20.7%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.75%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 16.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 0.61%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.3%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.5%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.3%, a difference of 0.42%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 34.8%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.5%).