Immigrants from China vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,266,885 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Crow within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Crow communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $31,729, a difference of 71.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $71,337, a difference of 67.9%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $63,681, a difference of 65.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $47,012, a difference of 23.2%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $35,266, a difference of 33.2%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 40.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Crow communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 127.9%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 105.6%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 104.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 20.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 40.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 256.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 223.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 221.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 90.4%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 63.5%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 37.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Crow communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 113.1%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 109.0%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 99.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.68%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 68.0%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 58.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.0%).