Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Central America
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Central America
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
297th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Central America Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,005,067 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 27.4 Immigrants from Central America.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Central America Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $34,974, a difference of 55.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $80,012, a difference of 49.7%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $45,538, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,022, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $53,420, a difference of 29.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Central America |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $34,974 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $85,050 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $74,217 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $39,762 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $45,538 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $33,953 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $51,022 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $80,012 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $85,965 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $53,420 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Central America Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 61.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 60.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.15%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 13.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Central America |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.9% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Fair 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 21.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 24.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Excellent 16.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 33.6% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Central America Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 42.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Central America |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 18.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 10.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Central America Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Central America |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Poor 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 35.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 82.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 80.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Central America Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 62.5%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 59.1%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 5.5%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.49, a difference of 8.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Central America |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 68.3% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 31.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Poor 45.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 44.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Central America Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 69.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 40.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 28.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Central America |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 8.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 91.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 23.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Central America Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 160.3%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 134.5%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 112.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Central America |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 96.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 96.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 96.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 95.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 95.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 94.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 94.0% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 91.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 90.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 89.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 86.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 84.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 83.0% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 80.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 54.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 48.5% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 35.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 27.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Central America Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 36.6%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Central America |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 26.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 50.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Good 3.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |