Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,462
SOCIAL INDEX
62.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
152nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 442,328,588 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 43.0 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $43,539, a difference of 24.6%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $55,241, a difference of 21.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $100,283, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $55,714, a difference of 4.0%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $64,089, a difference of 7.9%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Average $43,539 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Excellent $106,252 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Exceptional $91,541 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Excellent $47,671 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Good $55,241 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Excellent $40,558 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $55,714 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Exceptional $100,283 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Exceptional $106,109 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Exceptional $64,089 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 24.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 15.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.22%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Excellent 8.5% |
| Males | Excellent 10.7% | Excellent 10.6% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Excellent 12.7% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Excellent 15.2% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Exceptional 27.1% |
| Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Good 10.8% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Average 12.2% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.3% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
| Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Average 11.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Exceptional 17.1% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Excellent 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Average 6.7% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 4.7% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Good 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Poor 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Excellent 8.5% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 65.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Excellent 79.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Poor 35.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Average 75.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Poor 84.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Average 84.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Fair 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Average 82.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.5%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), currently married (47.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.0%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 67.5% |
| Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 29.1% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.36 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Poor 2.4% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 6.3% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Good 47.1% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 76.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 36.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 26.8%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 91.4% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 59.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 23.1% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 79.5%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 66.8%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.1% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.5% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.3% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 95.9% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 94.5% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 94.2% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 93.3% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 92.1% |
| 11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 90.9% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 89.6% |
| High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 87.2% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 84.1% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Fair 64.5% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Fair 58.5% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Fair 45.2% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Fair 36.8% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Poor 14.0% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Poor 1.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.5%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.63%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.3%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Average 23.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 48.7% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Excellent 2.1% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Good 3.0% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Excellent 17.0% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Poor 2.5% |