Uruguayan vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,901,445 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.653. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.345% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 1,345.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $77,465, a difference of 31.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $116,156, a difference of 17.7%), and median household income ($84,691 compared to $98,496, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.0%), per capita income ($44,318 compared to $46,098, a difference of 4.0%), and median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $41,461, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 49.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 47.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.3%), family households (64.5% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 57.2%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 37.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 34.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.9%), college, under 1 year (64.2% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and college, 1 year or more (58.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (38.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.090%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.3%).