Immigrants from China vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,159,920 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $39,403, a difference of 37.7%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $50,488, a difference of 33.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $90,722, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $64,920, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $53,078, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 35.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.96%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 44.1%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 34.6%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (47.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (64.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 88.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 48.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 111.1%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 95.4%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 82.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 41.8%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.9%), and male disability (9.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.0%).