Immigrants from China vs Arab Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Arab
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Arabs
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,013
SOCIAL INDEX
57.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
166th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arab Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 427,528,505 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.238. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 12.0 Arabs.
Immigrants from China vs Arab Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Arab communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $97,336, a difference of 23.0%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $88,398, a difference of 19.2%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $45,662, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.32%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $62,266, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,219, a difference of 13.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Arab |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Exceptional $45,662 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Excellent $106,952 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Excellent $88,398 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Exceptional $48,599 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Exceptional $57,298 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Excellent $40,718 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $51,219 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Excellent $97,336 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Excellent $104,566 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Good $62,266 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Poor 26.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Arab Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Arab communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 25.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Arab |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Fair 12.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 9.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Fair 13.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Poor 20.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Average 17.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Fair 16.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Fair 16.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Fair 16.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Good 20.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Good 29.0% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Good 11.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Arab Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Arab communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Arab |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Arab Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.58%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Arab |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Good 65.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Poor 79.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Good 36.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Poor 82.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Arab Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.1%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.070%), family households (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Arab |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 29.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Arab Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Arab communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 44.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 5.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Arab |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Fair 55.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Arab Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Arab communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.4%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.4%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.38%), ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Arab |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Good 96.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Good 95.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Good 95.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Excellent 94.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Excellent 91.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 67.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 61.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 40.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Arab Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Arab communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Arab |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Excellent 10.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Excellent 22.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Average 3.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Good 2.4% |