Italian vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Italian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Italians

Chinese

Excellent
Exceptional
8,365
SOCIAL INDEX
81.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
74th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Italian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,782,924 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Italian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Italians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Italians corresponds to an increase of 7.5 Chinese.
Italian Integration in Chinese Communities

Italian vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Italian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,885 compared to $77,465, a difference of 21.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,426 compared to $58,162, a difference of 8.9%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,215 compared to $104,264, a difference of 0.050%), median female earnings ($41,505 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.10%), and median earnings ($49,915 compared to $48,836, a difference of 2.2%).
Italian vs Chinese Income
Income MetricItalianChinese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,574
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,372
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$92,475
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,915
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,551
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,505
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,426
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,215
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,224
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,885
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Average
25.9%

Italian vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Italian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 21.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.7%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.89%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and male poverty (9.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.7%).
Italian vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricItalianChinese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.8%

Italian vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Italian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 69.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.4%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Italian vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricItalianChinese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%

Italian vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Italian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.52%).
Italian vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricItalianChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.1%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Exceptional
84.1%

Italian vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Italian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.34, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.4%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Italian vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricItalianChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.0%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.8%
Excellent
30.2%

Italian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Italian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 34.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.0%).
Italian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricItalianChinese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.4%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.8%

Italian vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Italian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 12.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%).
Italian vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricItalianChinese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.2%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.1%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.1%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.4%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Fair
1.8%

Italian vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Italian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 36.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.25%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Italian vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricItalianChinese
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.6%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%