Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Oceania
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Oceania
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 286,984,640 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Immigrants from Oceania.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $97,623, a difference of 22.7%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $55,712, a difference of 20.9%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $45,220, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $64,416, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $53,680, a difference of 7.9%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Excellent $45,220 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Excellent $106,453 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Exceptional $89,100 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Excellent $47,617 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Good $55,712 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Good $40,297 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $53,680 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Excellent $97,623 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Excellent $103,705 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Exceptional $64,416 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Average 25.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 24.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.3% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 8.7% |
| Males | Excellent 10.7% | Average 11.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Average 13.3% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Excellent 19.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 13.5% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Good 16.9% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Good 15.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Good 16.0% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Good 16.1% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Good 20.7% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Good 28.7% |
| Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Good 5.0% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Excellent 10.4% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Good 11.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Average 5.3% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Excellent 11.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Excellent 17.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.4% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Poor 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 7.5% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Oceania |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Excellent 65.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Poor 79.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 37.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Exceptional 76.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 33.1%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.31%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Good 46.9% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 6.3% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Average 46.5% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 11.9% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Excellent 30.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 55.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.7%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Oceania |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 9.7% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Excellent 90.4% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 57.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 21.8% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.7%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 47.3%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Oceania |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Poor 2.2% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Poor 97.8% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Poor 97.8% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Poor 97.8% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Poor 97.7% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Poor 97.1% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Poor 96.8% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.7% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Poor 94.5% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Poor 93.4% |
| 11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Fair 90.9% |
| High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Fair 88.8% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Fair 85.5% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Average 65.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Average 59.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Fair 45.8% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Fair 37.3% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Fair 14.7% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Good 4.6% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Good 1.9% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.0%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Fair 11.8% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Fair 11.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Good 12.1% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Fair 6.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Fair 11.4% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Poor 24.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 48.0% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Average 2.2% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 17.6% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Good 6.1% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 2.5% |