Immigrants from China vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,693,673 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 2.6 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $103,160, a difference of 16.1%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $93,379, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,383, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $65,652, a difference of 5.4%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $50,044, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.97%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 23.6%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 17.9%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.10%), currently married (47.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 47.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.8%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.0%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.73%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.7%).