Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Iraq Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,401,704 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Iraq. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 Immigrants from Iraq.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $89,444, a difference of 33.9%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $41,365, a difference of 31.2%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $52,681, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.010%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $53,384, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $59,824, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 27.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 26.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.8%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.26%), family households (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 102.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 82.1%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 62.0%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 33.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.6%).