Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Micronesia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

Immigrants from Micronesia

Good
Fair
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,414,873 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 3.7 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $80,544, a difference of 48.7%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $37,464, a difference of 44.8%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $47,177, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 9.1%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $61,000, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,691, a difference of 14.3%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Micronesia
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Tragic
$37,464
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Tragic
$90,345
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Tragic
$75,574
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Tragic
$41,133
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Tragic
$47,177
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Tragic
$35,477
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Tragic
$50,691
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Tragic
$80,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Tragic
$87,864
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Average
$61,000
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Exceptional
24.4%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 42.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 41.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.7%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Micronesia
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Tragic
23.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 46.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Micronesia
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.6%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 29.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Micronesia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Exceptional
77.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
81.1%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.0%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 35.9%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.73%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Micronesia
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Average
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Fair
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
44.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
45.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Poor
32.9%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 50.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 13.9%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Micronesia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Fair
55.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
20.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
7.6%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 129.2%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 107.9%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 96.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.11%), 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.45%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Micronesia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Tragic
61.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
54.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Tragic
40.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 48.5%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 38.6%), and male disability (9.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 8.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Micronesia
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Tragic
50.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%