Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Micronesia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Micronesia
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,414,873 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 3.7 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $80,544, a difference of 48.7%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $37,464, a difference of 44.8%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $47,177, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 9.1%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $61,000, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,691, a difference of 14.3%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $37,464 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $90,345 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $75,574 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $41,133 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $47,177 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $35,477 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $50,691 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $80,544 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $87,864 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Average $61,000 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 42.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 41.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.7%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
| Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 20.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.4% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 18.0% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 23.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 18.6% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 31.6% |
| Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Poor 5.5% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Good 10.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 46.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.3% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Excellent 11.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Average 17.6% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 8.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Average 8.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 29.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 64.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 78.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 40.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Exceptional 77.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 83.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 82.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 81.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.0%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 35.9%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.73%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.9%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Average 64.2% |
| Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Fair 27.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 44.9% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.32 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 45.6% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 50.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 13.9%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Good 10.1% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Good 90.1% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Fair 55.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 129.2%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 107.9%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 96.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.11%), 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.1% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Average 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Average 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Average 97.9% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Average 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Average 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Average 97.5% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Average 97.3% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Average 97.0% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Fair 95.9% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Fair 95.6% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Fair 94.7% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Fair 93.5% |
| 11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Poor 92.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Poor 90.6% |
| High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Poor 88.6% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 84.7% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 61.5% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 54.8% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 40.2% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 48.5%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 38.6%), and male disability (9.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 8.2%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 26.1% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 50.1% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.6% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 18.1% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |