Scandinavian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,717,535 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.766. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.104% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 104.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $77,465, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($86,073 compared to $98,496, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $116,156, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,527 compared to $56,872, a difference of 2.4%), per capita income ($43,848 compared to $46,098, a difference of 5.1%), and median earnings ($46,433 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.37%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 64.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.7%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.020%), births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and associate's degree (46.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.0%).