Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Chinese
7,654
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
109th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Israel Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,524,114 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 27.8 Chinese.
Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $46,098, a difference of 24.5%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $56,872, a difference of 20.8%), and median earnings ($57,034 compared to $48,836, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $58,162, a difference of 4.0%), median household income ($104,090 compared to $98,496, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,893 compared to $116,156, a difference of 5.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Israel | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $57,384 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $127,430 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $104,090 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $57,034 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $68,716 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,902 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,913 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $117,219 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,893 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,857 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 47.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 46.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 8.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Israel | Chinese |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Israel | Chinese |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.74%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Israel | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.2% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.5% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.6% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.4% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 20.3%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and family households (63.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%), currently married (48.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Israel | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.0% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.1% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 25.1% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 89.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 85.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 52.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Israel | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.5% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 49.2% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 76.0%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 72.7%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Israel | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 2.0% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Good 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Good 96.2% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 72.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 67.8% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 56.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 50.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 22.6% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.0% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 39.0%), male disability (9.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 6.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Israel | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.9% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |