Immigrants from China vs Basque Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,237,532 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Basques within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Basques. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Basques.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Basque communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $96,709, a difference of 23.8%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $38,352, a difference of 22.5%), and median earnings ($56,638 compared to $46,399, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 7.9%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $62,653, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,818, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Basque communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and single female poverty (18.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.1%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Basque communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Basque communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 26.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Basque communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.1%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.6%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Basque communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 95.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 39.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 8.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Basque communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 60.8%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 44.8%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.58%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Basque communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 38.9%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 37.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.5%).