Seminole vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,415,935 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Seminole communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.250. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Seminole corresponds to an increase of 53.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,373 compared to $77,465, a difference of 47.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,077 compared to $116,156, a difference of 45.1%), and median household income ($69,420 compared to $98,496, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($34,385 compared to $41,461, a difference of 20.6%), and median earnings ($40,233 compared to $48,836, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 83.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 81.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 77.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 17.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 41.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 42.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 43.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.5%), and divorced or separated (14.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households (64.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 25.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.82%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.6%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 54.0%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.6%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.9%).