Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,669,421 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.176. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.070% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 70.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $77,465, a difference of 38.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $116,156, a difference of 17.1%), and median household income ($84,740 compared to $98,496, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $56,872, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and median earnings ($47,304 compared to $48,836, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 46.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 77.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 42.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 39.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.5%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.0%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 44.5%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 81.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.8%), and associate's degree (40.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 57.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 36.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), male disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.3%).