Immigrants from China vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 412,328,749 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.617. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $80,843, a difference of 48.1%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $37,203, a difference of 45.9%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $72,682, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $47,848, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $54,133, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 59.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 53.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 49.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 48.6%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.1%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.16%), family households (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 95.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 8.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 112.5%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 104.3%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.18%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.87%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 84.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 77.6%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.6%).