Immigrants from Poland vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,118,947 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to a decrease of 22.9 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $77,465, a difference of 26.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,319 compared to $116,156, a difference of 9.2%), and median household income ($90,549 compared to $98,496, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,979 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.26%), median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.41%), and median earnings ($49,633 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 27.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 55.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.4%), married-couple households (48.1% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.19%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 52.4%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.4%), male disability (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.3%).