Taiwanese vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,818,843 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.055% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to a decrease of 55.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,894 compared to $77,465, a difference of 23.2%), householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $58,162, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,180 compared to $116,156, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,455 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.77%), median earnings ($47,902 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.9%), and median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $41,461, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 38.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.84%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and single father poverty (14.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 43.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 42.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.2%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.9%), male disability (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.6%).