Immigrants from China vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,653,551 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Tlingit-Haida.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $92,987, a difference of 28.8%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $52,409, a difference of 28.5%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $83,968, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $55,914, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $62,922, a difference of 9.9%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 37.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 36.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 166.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 42.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 30.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 44.9%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 31.3%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.3%), currently married (47.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (64.7% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 50.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 81.2%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 76.5%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 84.6%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 60.2%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 9.3%).