Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chinese
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,799,539 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.309% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 309.0 Chinese.
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $77,465, a difference of 32.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,293 compared to $116,156, a difference of 27.2%), and median household income ($77,559 compared to $98,496, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $41,461, a difference of 9.2%), median earnings ($43,416 compared to $48,836, a difference of 12.5%), and median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $56,872, a difference of 15.6%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,529 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,593 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $77,559 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,416 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,201 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,965 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,916 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,254 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,293 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,375 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 59.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 59.6%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.5%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 23.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.4%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chinese |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.6% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and family households (61.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 10.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 61.9% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.9% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 52.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 30.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.4% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 63.2%), associate's degree (44.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and college, 1 year or more (58.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.96%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 58.0% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 44.7% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.6% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.5%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chinese |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |