Immigrants from China vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 442,171,907 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.671. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 26.6 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $96,866, a difference of 23.6%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $86,084, a difference of 22.4%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $44,480, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 8.5%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $53,127, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $61,104, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.0%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 48.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.3%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.33%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 135.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 22.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 90.1%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 67.9%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 74.1%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.5%).