Immigrants from China vs Tongan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,434,131 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Tongans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $41,693, a difference of 30.1%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $53,218, a difference of 26.6%), and median earnings ($56,638 compared to $45,665, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $68,235, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $56,972, a difference of 1.7%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 26.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.3%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.94%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 32.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.5%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and family households (64.7% compared to 69.6%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 111.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 66.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 45.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 81.1%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 79.2%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 69.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.0% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.080%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and 7th grade (95.3% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 37.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.8%).