Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,043,679 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Salvadorans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 3.6 Salvadorans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $38,858, a difference of 39.7%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $48,646, a difference of 38.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $88,198, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $55,412, a difference of 4.5%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $59,141, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 44.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 43.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.31%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.6%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 48.9%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.8%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.48, a difference of 7.7%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 50.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 109.0%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 90.6%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 74.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 23.2%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.57%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.6%).