Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Salvadoran
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

Salvadorans

Good
Fair
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,588
SOCIAL INDEX
23.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
250th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Salvadoran Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,043,679 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Salvadorans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 3.6 Salvadorans.
Immigrants from China Integration in Salvadoran Communities

Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $38,858, a difference of 39.7%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $48,646, a difference of 38.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $88,198, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $55,412, a difference of 4.5%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $59,141, a difference of 17.0%).
Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaSalvadoran
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Tragic
$38,858
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Tragic
$94,109
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Poor
$82,449
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Tragic
$42,912
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Tragic
$48,646
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Tragic
$37,083
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Exceptional
$55,412
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Tragic
$88,198
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Tragic
$94,842
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Poor
$59,141
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Exceptional
23.0%

Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 44.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 43.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.31%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 7.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaSalvadoran
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
19.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
19.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaSalvadoran
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Tragic
18.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%

Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaSalvadoran
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
82.0%

Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.6%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 48.9%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.8%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.48, a difference of 7.7%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 8.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaSalvadoran
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Exceptional
67.2%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
29.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
44.7%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.48
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
43.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
36.0%

Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 50.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.7%).
Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaSalvadoran
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Excellent
56.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
7.8%

Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 109.0%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 90.6%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 74.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaSalvadoran
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
96.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
96.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
96.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
95.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
95.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
94.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
93.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
91.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
90.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
89.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Tragic
87.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
86.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
84.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
81.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
78.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Tragic
57.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
51.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Tragic
39.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
31.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 23.2%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.57%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaSalvadoran
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
25.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Tragic
48.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
2.5%