Immigrants from China vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Houma
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,074,442 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Houma.
Immigrants from China vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $72,093, a difference of 69.5%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $62,575, a difference of 68.3%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $76,188, a difference of 64.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $44,356, a difference of 30.6%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $50,547, a difference of 33.3%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 44.9%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Tragic 38.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 106.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 102.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 92.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 22.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Houma |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 77.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 62.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Houma |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 74.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 88.6%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 58.2%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.5%), family households (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Houma |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 46.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 13.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 4.9% |
Immigrants from China vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 222.2%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 203.6%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 167.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.090%), 2nd grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 0.96% |
Immigrants from China vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 114.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 100.2%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 93.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.9%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 28.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Houma |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.0% |